{"id":2948,"date":"2015-09-05T00:35:00","date_gmt":"2015-09-05T04:35:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/162.223.13.186\/~zacksim\/market-volatility-like-2008-or-1998\/"},"modified":"2022-02-26T13:23:04","modified_gmt":"2022-02-26T13:23:04","slug":"market-volatility-like-2008-or-1998","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/market-volatility-like-2008-or-1998\/","title":{"rendered":"Market Volatility \u2013 Like 2008 or 1998?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>If you\u2019re nervous about where the market is headed (after enduring two eyebrow-raising weeks of pronounced volatility) then guess what &#8211; you\u2019re normal. Human nature is to fear losses, and memory of the 2008 bear market still lingers. Nobel Prize-winning psychologist Daniel Kahneman discovered that investors dislike losses roughly twice as much as they enjoy gains. Frankly, I think losses are despised even more than that.<\/p>\n<p>It makes sense then that the current volatility has many questioning the sustainability of this bull market. The knee-jerk reaction is to sell stocks and ride-out volatility from the sidelines. But, I think that\u2019s the wrong move and I still see this current volatility as a short-term market correction, not a bear market. To me, this market is looking more and more like 1998 than 2008.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4 Reasons I Think This Market is More Like 1998 than 2008 <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Many investors won\u2019t remember this, but in 1998 the market took a steep dive from mid-July to midOctober, falling slightly more than 19% in total. But in 1998, the market did what it classically does in a correction \u2013 it falls quickly and steeply, posts a minirecovery mid-way through (kind of what we\u2019re seeing now), and then it falls quickly again until the correction finds its bottom. From there though, the market powers through to a very swift recovery, which in 1998 meant climbing some 28% from mid-October to the end of the year. Investors that got spooked out of the market given that volatility would have been majorly whip-sawed. My advice: don\u2019t be that investor.<\/p>\n<p>Indeed, I see a similar pattern forming today. I wouldn\u2019t be surprised if the market continues bouncing higher after big down days, luring investors to believe the correction is over when in fact there is still more downside left. But that\u2019s ok! We\u2019re only about three weeks into this downside volatility, and corrections can last anywhere from a few weeks to a few months. Market Insights September 7, 2015 Investors should brace for continued volatility, but not fear it. I still think fundamentals point to more secular upside from here, and this downside volatility should be short-lived with a quick recovery in the wings \u2013 just like 1998.<\/p>\n<p>Here are four similarities I see between 1998 and today:<\/p>\n<p><strong>1) Late Stage Bull Market<\/strong> \u2013 1998 was the eighth year of a ten year long bull market, and 2015 marks the 6th year of our current bull market. A lot of folks think this is too long to be in a bull market, but that\u2019s a false thought \u2013 bull markets since the Great Depression have lasted an average of 8 or so years, meaning for this one to last two more years would be quite normal.<\/p>\n<p><strong>2) Concerns over Asian and Emerging Market Currencies<\/strong> \u2013 at present, many are worried that the strengthening dollar is going to doom Emerging Markets [EM], especially if you tack-on lost revenues due to falling commodities prices (since many EM countries are energy and mineral exporters). A strengthening dollar also hurts EM countries because their debt is almost universally denominated in dollars, meaning that a strong dollar equates to more costly interest payments. All very true. Interestingly though, the same scenario occurred in 1997, when global markets rattled over the Asian currency crisis. Countries like Thailand, Indonesia, and South Korea rapidly saw their currencies fizzle in value, and experts predicted a complete collapse in the global markets. But it didn\u2019t happen. The stock market corrected then and there was a carry-over into 1998, but it wasn\u2019t enough to send equities into a prolonged downturn. The China economy concern (and currency devaluation) of today shouldn\u2019t either.<\/p>\n<p><strong>3) Interest Rate Hikes Looming<\/strong> \u2013 as it turns out, 1998 was the precursor to a series of interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve \u2013 just like 2015 seems to be. From 1999 \u2013 2000, the Fed raised interest rates six times from 4.75% to 6.50%, but the market also annualized 5% over the same period! For everyone that fears interest rate hikes by the Fed, all they need is a history lesson: stocks have done remarkably well during the past three rate hike cycles.<\/p>\n<p><strong>4) Optimism Building, but Not Fully Developed<\/strong> \u2013 there\u2019s no quantitative evidence to support this, but my general feeling is that investors aren\u2019t entirely comfortable with this bull market. In my view, there has to be some level of unjustified optimism about stocks in order for me to believe they are overpriced. And I just don\u2019t see that today. In my opinion, stocks thrive on skepticism \u2013 they love to climb that \u2018wall of worry.\u2019 And that wall very much exists today, especially now.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bottom Line for Investors <\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Many are tempted to think that this market\u2019s volatility is somehow unprecedented, and the media are quick to spin the downside. But that is simply the wrong way to think. The market has endured steep quick declines in the past (1998, 2011) and recovered briskly at a moment\u2019s notice. I think the same applies to the current scenario, and that investors should hold their breath a bit and remain patient. Downside volatility is scary, but often times it\u2019s just temporary. I think it is this time too.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211; Mitch<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">Zacks Investment Management, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Zacks Investment Research. Zacks Investment Management is an independent Registered Investment Advisory firm and acts an investment manager for individuals and institutions. Zacks Investment Research is a provider of earnings data and other financial data to institutions and to individuals.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 11px;\">This communication is for informational purposes only and nothing herein should be construed as a solicitation, recommendation or an offer to buy or sell any securities or product, and does not constitute legal or tax advice. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but we do not guarantee accuracy or completeness. Zacks Investment Management, Inc. is not engaged in rendering legal, tax, accounting or other professional services. Publication and distribution of this article is not intended to create, and the information contained herein does not constitute, an attorney- client relationship. Do not act or rely upon the information and advice given in this publication without seeking the services of competent and professional legal, tax, or accounting counsel.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If you\u2019re nervous about where the market is headed (after enduring two eyebrow-raising weeks of pronounced volatility) then guess what [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":4122,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[62,71],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2948","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-market-insights","category-private-client-group"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2948","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2948"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2948\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11526,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2948\/revisions\/11526"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2948"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2948"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2948"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}