{"id":4083,"date":"2017-01-15T14:58:33","date_gmt":"2017-01-15T19:58:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/162.223.13.186\/~zacksim\/?p=4083"},"modified":"2022-02-26T13:20:46","modified_gmt":"2022-02-26T13:20:46","slug":"bear-market-looming","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/bear-market-looming\/","title":{"rendered":"Is a Bear Market Looming?"},"content":{"rendered":"

The Sc<\/span>hiller Cyclically Adjusted P\/E (CAPE) Ratio hit 28<\/strong> in recent days, which according to some news outlets \u201clooks terrifying right now\u201d and signals that the stock market may be \u201cdangerously expensive.\u201d Is it time for investors to ditch stocks and run for cover?<\/p>\n

There\u2019s a reason the alarm bells are sounding \u2013 on two previous occasions when the CAPE Ratio touched this level or higher, the market flipped over into a bear market. The ratio was near this level in 2007 just before the financial crisis. Additionally, it was just above its current level in 2000 before the tech bust and in 1929 leading into the Great Depression. It doesn\u2019t take a sophisticated analysis to see that the CAPE Ratio at this level has been a dangerous precedent in the past. Many are urging investors to exercise extreme caution in portfolios.<\/p>\n

Understanding the CAPE Ratio (And Its Limitations)<\/strong><\/p>\n

Before you go liquidating stocks in your portfolio, let\u2019s take a moment to understand the origins and makeup of the CAPE Ratio \u2013 which will also help you understand if this is really a time to sell<\/em>. A good starting point for understanding the CAPE ratio is to think about the basic P\/E ratio (price to earnings) first. The P\/E ratio measures a stock\u2019s price relative to its per-share earnings over the last year. It is a widely accepted metric for measuring valuations, but Robert Shiller and fellow economist John Y. Campbell (now at Harvard) saw a problem with it.<\/p>\n

They recognized that a company\u2019s earnings can be fairly volatile from year to year, and that this is especially true during peak and trough years in a business cycle. So, to minimize the effect of business cycle gyrations on the valuation measure, the two economists created a ratio where the stock price is divided by the company\u2019s average earnings over the previous 10 years<\/em>, instead of just a single year. This helps \u201csmooth\u201d out the number and allows for comparing valuations over longer time horizons.<\/p>\n

The CAPE calculation makes sense at face value, but there are several limitations to the calculations. For one, the past 10-years include the Great Recession and the Energy sector earnings recession, both of which hamstring the earnings averages considerably (since earnings are in the denominator of P\/E, lower earnings mean higher ratios).<\/p>\n

But perhaps the biggest \u2013 and least discussed \u2013 factor affecting CAPE ratios today are accounting rule changes that have pushed recent earnings lower. According to Wharton professor Jeremy Siegel, there have been countless revisions to the generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) that Sc<\/span>hiller uses, and that these changes have lowered GAAP earnings even though there were no changes to the underlying business of the corporation. It\u2019d be like a company undergoing a 2-for-1 stock split and being treated like it was valued differently after the split, even though its market value doesn\u2019t change whatsoever. Because these accounting changes have lowered GAAP earnings, the CAPE ratio has risen \u2013 but not because prices are too high relative to earnings.<\/p>\n

Don\u2019t Fear the CAPE \u2013 It\u2019s Been This High Before, and Stocks Have Done Fine<\/strong><\/p>\n

In August of 2014, the CAPE once again flashed red, but nothing bad happened. In an August 16, 2014 New York Times <\/em>op-ed, Shiller himself wrote that \u201cthe United States stock market looks very expensive right now. The CAPE [cyclically adjusted price-earnings] ratio, a stock-price measure I helped develop \u2013 is hovering at a worrisome level.\u201d Well, guess what \u2013 the S&P 500 is up over 15% since Sc<\/span>hiller wrote those words, and our outlook remains that stocks can move higher from here on additional economic growth and mid- to high-single digit earnings growth this year.<\/p>\n

Scrutinizing the CAPE ratio against historical returns for the S&P 500 reveals more weaknesses with the ratio. The data in the table below demonstrates how the market can do quite well even when CAPE ratios exceed 25:<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Bottom Line for Investors<\/strong><\/p>\n

Even Shiller agrees that the CAPE ratio shouldn\u2019t be used as an actual market-timing tool. Rather, he thinks investors should use the CAPE ratios to trim positions that exhibit especially high ratios. Ok, fine.<\/p>\n

The bottom line for investors is that a single metric such as the CAPE ratio should not be relied upon to make sweeping investment decisions or forecasts. Stocks are much more complicated than that, and they move on a myriad of factors at any given time. The keys, in our view, are focusing on leading economic indicators, economic growth expectations, forward earnings, the yield curve, the regulatory environment, amongst others. In other words, there are several factors to consider when assessing what stocks may do in the quarters ahead \u2013 not just a single factor like the CAPE ratio.<\/p>\n

So just how does Zacks Investment Management view the economy right now? I invite you to download our Stock Market Outlook free of charge. Click the link below to download your copy today:<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Schiller Cyclically Adjusted P\/E (CAPE) Ratio hit 28 in recent days, which according to some news outlets \u201clooks terrifying […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[54,71],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4083","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-company-news","category-private-client-group"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4083","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4083"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4083\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11103,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4083\/revisions\/11103"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4083"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4083"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4083"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}