{"id":8456,"date":"2020-01-21T15:52:44","date_gmt":"2020-01-21T15:52:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/zackspcg.com\/blog\/?p=8456"},"modified":"2022-02-26T13:06:48","modified_gmt":"2022-02-26T13:06:48","slug":"cape-ratio-says-market-is-overvaluedbut-is-it","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/cape-ratio-says-market-is-overvaluedbut-is-it\/","title":{"rendered":"CAPE Ratio Says Market is Overvalued\u2026But Is It?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The Nobel laureate economist, Robert Shiller, recently penned an article in&nbsp;<em>The New York<\/em>&nbsp;<em>Times&nbsp;<\/em>warning, amongst other things, that market valuations (as measured by the CAPE ratio) were at levels not seen since 1929 and 1999.<sup>1<\/sup>&nbsp;Market historians would note that 1929 and 1999 preceded weak decades for market returns, with the Great Depression on the one hand and the Tech Bubble and Great Recession on the other.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>With the start of a new decade in 2020 and the historically high CAPE ratio, it begs the question:&nbsp;<em>are we in year one of a weak decade for stocks?<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>First, an Understanding of How the CAPE Ratio Works<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A good starting point for understanding the CAPE ratio is to think about the basic P\/E ratio first. The P\/E (price to earnings) ratio measures a stock\u2019s price relative to its per-share earnings over the last year. It is a widely-accepted metric for valuation, but Shiller and fellow economist John Y. Campbell saw a problem with it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>They recognized that a company\u2019s earnings can be fairly volatile from year to year, and that earnings volatility is especially true during peak and trough years in a business cycle. So, to minimize the effect of short-term business cycle gyrations on the valuation measure, the two economists created a ratio where the stock price is divided by the company\u2019s average earnings&nbsp;<em>over the previous 10 years<\/em>, instead of just a single year. This helps \u201csmooth\u201d out the number and allows for comparing valuations over a longer time horizon.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A high CAPE ratio signals an overvalued market, and Shiller notes that the current CAPE ratio (31) has only been higher twice in history: 1929 and 1999. The S&amp;P 500 fell some -85% through 1932 and -50% in the 2000 bear market.<sup>2<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>_____________________________________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/go.steadyinvestor.com\/arrow-stock-market-outlook?source=website&amp;medium=blog&amp;term=motm_blog_2020_1_20&amp;content=stock_market_outlook_report\"><strong>Does this Mean a Bear Market is Around the Corner?<\/strong><\/a><br>&nbsp;<br>The CAPE ratio is only one factor to consider. Instead of letting one indicator make you fearful of a bear market, I recommend focusing on the whole picture. In addition to the CAPE ratio, it is important to keep an eye on fundamentals, earnings, growth, innovation and other key economic indicators, in my view. To help you do this, we are offering all readers a look into our just-released February 2020 Stock Market Outlook report.<br><br>This report will provide you with our forecasts along with additional factors to consider:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li><em>U.S. returns expectations for 2020<\/em><\/li><li><em>What Produces 2020 Optimism?&nbsp;<\/em><\/li><li><em>What of U.S. GDP Growth?<\/em><\/li><li><em>Is it time to buy U.S. stocks in January?&nbsp;<\/em><\/li><li><em>Will the \u201cU.S. China Trade War\u201d remain a stumbling block in 2020?<\/em><\/li><li><em>Small-cap vs. large-cap returns<\/em><\/li><li><em>And much more.&nbsp;<\/em><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>If you have $500,000 or more to invest and want to learn more about these forecasts, click on the link below to get your free report today!<br><br><a href=\"https:\/\/go.steadyinvestor.com\/arrow-stock-market-outlook?source=website&amp;medium=blog&amp;term=motm_blog_2020_1_20&amp;content=stock_market_outlook_report\"><strong>IT&#8217;S FREE. Download the Just-Released February 2020 Stock Market Outlook<sup>3&nbsp;<\/sup><\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>_____________________________________________________________________<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Ready to Run for the Exits? Not So Fast.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The CAPE ratio is a useful indicator and has plenty of merits. But in my view, making investment decisions based solely on CAPE ratio levels is flawed, if not outright wrong.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For one, the CAPE ratio uses decade-old earnings data, which is great for historical comparisons but tells us virtually nothing&nbsp;<em>about what lies ahead<\/em>&nbsp;(which is exactly what we want to inform our investment decisions). Factors like falling energy prices, cheaper commodities, productivity gains, currency fluctuations, and powerful new technologies and innovations (just to name a few) are likely to contribute significantly \u2013 or conversely weigh down \u2013 a company\u2019s future earnings, in my view.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Remember, a stock\u2019s price today is greatly influenced by what investors are&nbsp;<em>willing to pay for<\/em>&nbsp;<em>expected earnings<\/em>, meaning that sentiment, growth forecasts, innovation, and management play key roles. The CAPE ratio doesn\u2019t account for any of these things.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Another reason I believe investors should not rely only on CAPE ratios to make investment decisions:&nbsp;<em>doing so would have likely meant missing out on big gains in this bull market<\/em>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In 2013,&nbsp;<em>The Wall Street Journal<\/em>&nbsp;wrote of a \u201crising concern among some market watchers that stocks are being lifted by a potentially dangerous bubble, with Shiller\u2019s index seen as one of the early warning signs.\u201d<sup>4<\/sup>&nbsp;In 2016,&nbsp;<em>The Wall Street Journal<\/em>&nbsp;published an article titled, \u201cStock Valuations Flash a Warning Sign\u201d when the CAPE ratio rose above 27. In that article, readers were reminded that when the CAPE ratio reaches it top decile, the S&amp;P 500 averages about 4% annually for the following ten years.<sup>5<\/sup><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Either of these articles \u2013 or the dozens of others that cited warning signs for the CAPE ratio over the last decade \u2013 could make a theoretically compelling case for investors to pare down equity exposure. But the chart below illustrates quite clearly why I believe it would not have made good investment sense to do so.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>In Spite of CAPE Ratio Warnings, the S&amp;P 500 has Continued to Climb<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image\"><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/02\/4_image-1-of-1-1024x395.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-8457\"\/><figcaption> <br><strong><em>Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis<sup>6<\/sup><\/em><\/strong> <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Bottom Line for Investors<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Investors are constantly searching for ways to \u2018value\u2019 the market. Valuations help us determine when stocks are cheap and therefore attractive, or when they\u2019re expensive and should be avoided. But valuations alone should not direct an investment strategy. If they did, and you relied on the CAPE metric as a proxy for when to invest in the last twenty years, you may have never owned equities! For a long-term growth investor, that would have been a mistake, in my view.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>If today we saw a confluence of negative economic data alongside a high and rising CAPE ratio, then we\u2019d probably have something to fear. But we don\u2019t think that\u2019s the case at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Global growth is expected to hit close to 3% in 2020, interest rates remain low globally, inflation is low and controlled in the U.S., the labor market is strong as ever, and corporate profits are expected to post strong growth following weak comparisons in 2019. The CAPE ratio may signal trouble in the decade ahead, but at the end of the day (and decade), I believe it is fundamentals, earnings, growth, and innovation that will determine the market outcome.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>To help you get a deeper insight into these factors and other key economic indicators, check out our\u00a0<strong><a href=\"http:\/\/The Nobel laureate economist, Robert Shiller, recently penned an article in The New York Times warning, amongst other things, that market valuations (as measured by the CAPE ratio) were at levels not seen since 1929 and 1999.1 Market historians would note that 1929 and 1999 preceded weak decades for market returns, with the Great Depression on the one hand and the Tech Bubble and Great Recession on the other.  With the start of a new decade in 2020 and the historically high CAPE ratio, it begs the question: are we in year one of a weak decade for stocks?  First, an Understanding of How the CAPE Ratio Works  A good starting point for understanding the CAPE ratio is to think about the basic P\/E ratio first. The P\/E (price to earnings) ratio measures a stock\u2019s price relative to its per-share earnings over the last year. It is a widely-accepted metric for valuation, but Shiller and fellow economist John Y. Campbell saw a problem with it.  They recognized that a company\u2019s earnings can be fairly volatile from year to year, and that earnings volatility is especially true during peak and trough years in a business cycle. So, to minimize the effect of short-term business cycle gyrations on the valuation measure, the two economists created a ratio where the stock price is divided by the company\u2019s average earnings over the previous 10 years, instead of just a single year. This helps \u201csmooth\u201d out the number and allows for comparing valuations over a longer time horizon.  A high CAPE ratio signals an overvalued market, and Shiller notes that the current CAPE ratio (31) has only been higher twice in history: 1929 and 1999. The S&amp;P 500 fell some -85% through 1932 and -50% in the 2000 bear market.2  _____________________________________________________________________  Does this Mean a Bear Market is Around the Corner?   The CAPE ratio is only one factor to consider. Instead of letting one indicator make you fearful of a bear market, I recommend focusing on the whole picture. In addition to the CAPE ratio, it is important to keep an eye on fundamentals, earnings, growth, innovation and other key economic indicators, in my view. To help you do this, we are offering all readers a look into our just-released February 2020 Stock Market Outlook report.  This report will provide you with our forecasts along with additional factors to consider:  U.S. returns expectations for 2020 What Produces 2020 Optimism?  What of U.S. GDP Growth? Is it time to buy U.S. stocks in January?  Will the \u201cU.S. China Trade War\u201d remain a stumbling block in 2020? Small-cap vs. large-cap returns And much more.  If you have $500,000 or more to invest and want to learn more about these forecasts, click on the link below to get your free report today!  IT'S FREE. Download the Just-Released February 2020 Stock Market Outlook3   _____________________________________________________________________  Ready to Run for the Exits? Not So Fast.  The CAPE ratio is a useful indicator and has plenty of merits. But in my view, making investment decisions based solely on CAPE ratio levels is flawed, if not outright wrong.  For one, the CAPE ratio uses decade-old earnings data, which is great for historical comparisons but tells us virtually nothing about what lies ahead (which is exactly what we want to inform our investment decisions). Factors like falling energy prices, cheaper commodities, productivity gains, currency fluctuations, and powerful new technologies and innovations (just to name a few) are likely to contribute significantly \u2013 or conversely weigh down \u2013 a company\u2019s future earnings, in my view.  Remember, a stock\u2019s price today is greatly influenced by what investors are willing to pay for expected earnings, meaning that sentiment, growth forecasts, innovation, and management play key roles. The CAPE ratio doesn\u2019t account for any of these things.  Another reason I believe investors should not rely only on CAPE ratios to make investment decisions: doing so would have likely meant missing out on big gains in this bull market.  In 2013, The Wall Street Journal wrote of a \u201crising concern among some market watchers that stocks are being lifted by a potentially dangerous bubble, with Shiller\u2019s index seen as one of the early warning signs.\u201d4 In 2016, The Wall Street Journal published an article titled, \u201cStock Valuations Flash a Warning Sign\u201d when the CAPE ratio rose above 27. In that article, readers were reminded that when the CAPE ratio reaches it top decile, the S&amp;P 500 averages about 4% annually for the following ten years.5  Either of these articles \u2013 or the dozens of others that cited warning signs for the CAPE ratio over the last decade \u2013 could make a theoretically compelling case for investors to pare down equity exposure. But the chart below illustrates quite clearly why I believe it would not have made good investment sense to do so.  In Spite of CAPE Ratio Warnings, the S&amp;P 500 has Continued to Climb  Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis6  Bottom Line for Investors  Investors are constantly searching for ways to \u2018value\u2019 the market. Valuations help us determine when stocks are cheap and therefore attractive, or when they\u2019re expensive and should be avoided. But valuations alone should not direct an investment strategy. If they did, and you relied on the CAPE metric as a proxy for when to invest in the last twenty years, you may have never owned equities! For a long-term growth investor, that would have been a mistake, in my view.  If today we saw a confluence of negative economic data alongside a high and rising CAPE ratio, then we\u2019d probably have something to fear. But we don\u2019t think that\u2019s the case at all.  Global growth is expected to hit close to 3% in 2020, interest rates remain low globally, inflation is low and controlled in the U.S., the labor market is strong as ever, and corporate profits are expected to post strong growth following weak comparisons in 2019. The CAPE ratio may signal trouble in the decade ahead, but at the end of the day (and decade), I believe it is fundamentals, earnings, growth, and innovation that will determine the market outcome.  To help you get a deeper insight into these factors and other key economic indicators, check out our Just-Released February 2020 Stock Market Outlook Report.   This Special Report is packed with newly revised predictions to consider for 2020 that can help you base your next investment move on hard data. For example, you'll discover Zacks\u2019 view on:  U.S. returns expectations for 2020 What Produces 2020 Optimism?  What of U.S. GDP Growth? Is it time to buy U.S. stocks in January?  Will the \u201cU.S. China Trade War\u201d remain a stumbling block in 2020? Small-cap vs. large-cap returns And much more.  If you have $500,000 or more to invest and want to learn more about these forecasts, click on the link below to get your free report on fundamentals, earnings, growth, and innovation today!   FREE Download \u2013 Zacks' February 2020 Stock Market Outlook7\">Just-Released February 2020 Stock Market Outlook Report.<\/a><\/strong><br>\u00a0<br>This Special Report is packed with newly revised predictions to consider for 2020 that can help you base your next investment move on hard data. For example, you&#8217;ll discover Zacks\u2019 view on:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li><em>U.S. returns expectations for 2020<\/em><\/li><li><em>What Produces 2020 Optimism?&nbsp;<\/em><\/li><li><em>What of U.S. GDP Growth?<\/em><\/li><li><em>Is it time to buy U.S. stocks in January?&nbsp;<\/em><\/li><li><em>Will the \u201cU.S. China Trade War\u201d remain a stumbling block in 2020?<\/em><\/li><li><em>Small-cap vs. large-cap returns<\/em><\/li><li><em>And much more.&nbsp;<\/em><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>If you have $500,000 or more to invest and want to learn more about these forecasts, click on the link below to get your free report on fundamentals, earnings, growth, and innovation today!\u00a0<sup>7<\/sup><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Investors running for the exits based on the CAPE ratio are ignoring other positive market signals<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":7430,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[63,71],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-8456","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-mitch-on-the-markets","category-private-client-group"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8456"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8456\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10651,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8456\/revisions\/10651"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}