On June 23, 2016, voters in the United Kingdom took the bold step of opting to leave the European Union. Yet here we are, over two years later, and there is still no deal for how \u2018Brexit\u2019 will actually occur \u2013 in fact, the two sides aren\u2019t even close.1<\/p>\n
The drama reached new heights this week as Britain\u2019s chief negotiator in talks with the EU, David Davis, and Britain\u2019s foreign secretary and Brexit hardliner, Boris Johnson, both quit their government posts. When British Prime Minister Theresa May won a snap election last year and promised a \u201cstrong and stable\u201d U.K., this was clearly not what she was expecting.2<\/p>\n
In our view, the overarching lesson to draw from the U.K.\u2019s experience is this: separating and attempting to re-draw markets that are globally intertwined is a near-impossible feat. The populist wave that has emboldened voters across the world to reject globalization in favor of a more isolationist approach is resulting in outcomes that, in our view, are leaving no one better off. And it\u2019s questionable whether that will change moving forward.<\/p>\n
Now, the U.K. is inching closer to a deadline of March 29, 2019 to reach a deal with the European Union. But with each iteration of the potential path forward, it appears that the U.K. is conceding more and more.<\/p>\n
Just this past week, Prime Minister Theresa May made a notable shift to a \u201csofter\u201d Brexit stance that would continue to abide by the European Union\u2019s rules in the industrial and agricultural products space, but that would free Britain from following European rules for services \u2013 an approach designed to benefit Britain\u2019s lead industries of banking and finance. The new approach would also see Britain reject the European demand for free movement of people across borders, although goods would be allowed to pass freely between Ireland (which will remain part the bloc) and Northern Ireland (which will not). While it may seem like May\u2019s government made real progress arriving at consensus, it could be all for naught \u2013 the European Union has not agreed to any of these terms, and in our view, rejecting free movement of people is pretty much a non-starter for the EU.3<\/p>\n
Businesses aren\u2019t thrilled about all of the uncertainty. In recent weeks, several major British employers have issued warnings over the economic and investment risks that could result from Brexit. There have been several warnings, but perhaps the most vocal one came from Jaguar Land Rover, which said that a disorderly Brexit could derail more than $100 billion worth of investment plans in Britain and force factory closures.\u00a0Airbus\u00a0and BMW have also voiced concerns that a disorderly or \u201chard\u201d Brexit could result in moving manufacturing facilities out of Britain. Moving factories and reducing investment does not make the U.K. \u2013 or its citizens \u2013 better off, in our view.4<\/p>\n
Bottom Line for Investors<\/strong><\/p>\n The key dates from here will be October 18, 2018, and March 29, 2019. In October, there is an EU summit where both sides will hope to agree on an outline of future relations, which will in turn give time to the UK parliament and EU members to ratify a deal by Brexit day (March 29, 2019). Deal or no deal, Brexit takes place on March 29, 2019 \u2013 at which time a sudden, hard exit is possible assuming that the two sides haven\u2019t made any agreements on trade, customs or migration. Such an outcome could have profound consequences for both the U.K. and the E.U.5<\/p>\n At the end of the day, in our view, Britain\u2019s government is learning the hard way that globalization is excruciatingly difficult to stifle, and even more difficult to reverse once corporations have embraced it. We think globalization, like it or not, is here to stay.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" On June 23, 2016, voters in the United Kingdom took the bold step of opting to leave the European Union. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":4789,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7158","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-mitch-on-the-markets"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/financial-professionals-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7158","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/financial-professionals-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/financial-professionals-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/financial-professionals-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/financial-professionals-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7158"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/financial-professionals-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7158\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8911,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/financial-professionals-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7158\/revisions\/8911"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/financial-professionals-insights\/wp-json\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/financial-professionals-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7158"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/financial-professionals-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7158"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/zacksim.com\/financial-professionals-insights\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7158"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}