Hector F. from Galveston, TX asks: Mitch, do you think the August 1 deadline when tariff rates are supposed to rise is a big deal? I don’t think anyone can keep up with all the changes and I wonder if everything is going to get shaken up again. Thanks for your time.
Mitch’s Response:
Thanks for writing, Hector. The tariff deadline does seem to be looming large. For readers who aren’t familiar, August 1 is the date that reciprocal tariffs are scheduled to go into effect on countries that haven’t struck trade deals with the U.S. It’s also the deadline for a new set of sector-specific tariffs on key industries like pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, copper, lumber, and potentially others down the line (e.g., commercial aircraft and critical minerals).1
Some of the numbers being floated, like a potential 200% tariff on generic drugs after a multi-year phase-in, are nothing short of eye-popping. It makes sense for this issue to be front and center for market watchers and investors.
But interestingly enough, I don’t think you need to be overly concerned.
First, markets have known about this date for months. The details surrounding these tariffs have been widely reported, debated, and in many cases leaked in advance. There’s already been speculation about which products will be hit, which industries will get carve-outs, and whether the administration will follow through. In short, as with other tariff threats and pronouncements made in late April and May, this is not a surprise.
Second, the track record here matters. The administration has taken a “maximum pressure” approach to trade negotiations—threaten high tariffs, float worst-case scenarios, then negotiate something milder. The strategy has often been more about leverage than actual implementation. That doesn’t mean the tariffs won’t happen, but it does mean markets have grown conditioned to treat these headlines as part of a familiar pattern, not as an economic doomsday clock.
Third, even if some of these tariffs do take effect, the impact will likely be gradual. The administration has floated phase-in periods of up to two years, and several of the targeted sectors, like rare earth minerals, have no real domestic industry to shield, which makes near-term implementation more symbolic than practical.
From an investment standpoint, the real risk is not the tariffs themselves, but whether they represent a surprise to markets. Given that the starting point is maximally punitive, I think the ‘not-as-bad-as-feared’ outcome is the most likely. We also know that sentiment around trade policy is quite dire, with many investors expecting tariffs to dent growth, raise costs, and inject volatility. In my view, this pessimism is priced in, so if the final rollout ends up being lighter than expected, it could actually register as a relief and send markets rallying. I want to be clear, however, in reminding readers that volatility is not off the table. There is still potential for negative surprises especially on highly visible sectors like semiconductors or pharmaceuticals. But broadly speaking, I think the familiar pattern of trade that markets have become accustomed to will repeat itself here.
Disclosure
1 Yahoo Finance. 2025. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-aims-tariff-double-whammy-164000210.html
DISCLOSURE
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss.
Zacks Investment Management, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Zacks Investment Research. Zacks Investment Management is an independent Registered Investment Advisory firm and acts as an investment manager for individuals and institutions. Zacks Investment Research is a provider of earnings data and other financial data to institutions and to individuals.
This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. Do not act or rely upon the information and advice given in this publication without seeking the services of competent and professional legal, tax, or accounting counsel. Publication and distribution of this article is not intended to create, and the information contained herein does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment or strategy is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of herein and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole.
Any projections, targets, or estimates in this report are forward looking statements and are based on the firm’s research, analysis, and assumptions. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Clients should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.
Certain economic and market information contained herein has been obtained from published sources prepared by other parties. Zacks Investment Management does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information. Further, no third party has assumed responsibility for independently verifying the information contained herein and accordingly no such persons make any representations with respect to the accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of the information provided herein. Unless otherwise indicated, market analysis and conclusions are based upon opinions or assumptions that Zacks Investment Management considers to be reasonable. Any investment inherently involves a high degree of risk, beyond any specific risks discussed herein.
It is not possible to invest directly in an index. Investors pursuing a strategy similar to an index may experience higher or lower returns, which will be reduced by fees and expenses.
The S&P 500 Index is a well-known, unmanaged index of the prices of 500 large-company common stocks, mainly blue-chip stocks, selected by Standard & Poor’s. The S&P 500 Index assumes reinvestment of dividends but does not reflect advisory fees. The volatility of the benchmark may be materially different from the individual performance obtained by a specific investor. An investor cannot invest directly in an index.
The Russell 1000 Growth Index is a well-known, unmanaged index of the prices of 1000 large-company growth common stocks selected by Russell. The Russell 1000 Growth Index assumes reinvestment of dividends but does not reflect advisory fees. An investor cannot invest directly in an index. The volatility of the benchmark may be materially different from the individual performance obtained by a specific investor.
Nasdaq Composite Index is the market capitalization-weighted index of over 3,300 common equities listed on the Nasdaq stock exchange. The types of securities in the index include American depositary receipts, common stocks, real estate investment trusts (REITs) and tracking stocks, as well as limited partnership interests. The index includes all Nasdaq-listed stocks that are not derivatives, preferred shares, funds, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) or debenture securities. An investor cannot invest directly in an index. The volatility of the benchmark may be materially different from the individual performance obtained by a specific investor.
“The Dow Jones Industrial Average measures the daily stock market movements of 30 U.S. publicly-traded companies listed on the NASDAQ or the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The 30 publicly-owned companies are considered leaders in the United States economy. An investor cannot directly invest in an index. The volatility of the benchmark may be materially different from the individual performance obtained by a specific investor.”
Returns for each strategy and the corresponding Morningstar Universe reflect the annualized returns for the periods indicated. The Morningstar Universes used for comparative analysis are constructed by Morningstar (median performance) and data is provided to Zacks by Zephyr Style Advisor. The percentile ranking for each Zacks Strategy is based on the gross comparison for Zacks Strategies vs. the indicated universe rounded up to the nearest whole percentile. Other managers included in universe by Morningstar may exhibit style drift when compared to Zacks Investment Management portfolio. Neither Zacks Investment Management nor Zacks Investment Research has any affiliation with Morningstar. Neither Zacks Investment Management nor Zacks Investment Research had any influence of the process Morningstar used to determine this ranking.
The Russell 1000 Value Index is a well-known, unmanaged index of the prices of 1000 large-company value common stocks selected by Russell. The Russell 1000 Value Index assumes reinvestment of dividends but does not reflect advisory fees. An investor cannot directly invest in an index. The volatility of the benchmark may be materially different from the individual performance obtained by a specific investor.