Private Client Group

April 7th, 2016

US Productivity Slowdown Troublesome?

Share
Subscribe

Recent reports on labor productivity in the U.S. have been underwhelming. Labor productivity growth is lagging behind the momentum of the mid-1990s through the early-2000s, creating additional concerns about the “new normal” of economic growth in the U.S.

As measured by output per unit of labor hours, its pace has slowed to a +1.2% average annual growth rate over 2007-2015, as revealed by Bureau of Labor Statistics data:

Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics

To better understand the implications, we have to first look at what actually drove the rapid acceleration of the mid-‘90s. Rapid innovation in information technology and internet usage almost single-handedly revolutionized the way we work. The days of manual calculations and communication bottlenecks disappeared, and software expedited virtually all phases of business from production to sales. Industries producing and using computers, internet and software saw their productivity soar, and as a result the output for each working hour climbed into historic territory.

Growth is measured relative to the period that came before it, and so it is logical that productivity gains would steadily taper off as the internet age grows older. Productivity is higher than it’s ever been; it’s just not growing as quickly because the gains are now incremental.

Also, the gains from the IT revolution came after a period of subdued productivity growth. A working paper in 2014 by John Fernald (Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco) asserts that productivity growth was “exceptional” due to the tech-boom and was restored, prior to the Great Recession, to “normal” levels of 1973-95. The paper further suggests that this softening of productivity growth was concentrated in IT-producing and IT-using sectors.

Source: John Fernald (2014). “Productivity and Potential Output Before, During, and After the Great Recession.” Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, June 5, 2014.

The “Wait and See”

It is also worth considering that every innovation must be allowed some time before we can realize its full potential. That’s because even with a promising new technology, there may be a lag before its benefits can be most efficiently utilized and also for businesses to restructure their operations accordingly. Even after inception of the first series of computers, productivity did not really hit its stride until after the development of various software applications and the advent of cloud computing. Other recent innovations (that are also ongoing) in fields like robotics, the ‘Internet of Things’ and 3D printing may have tremendous potential yet to transform our world in unprecedented ways, so it is very much a “wait and see.”

Bottom Line for Investors

At Zacks Investment Management, we view the slowing of productivity from previous, IT-led lofty levels as not necessarily a bad thing. For one, it keeps deflationary pressures at bay and boosts employment of labor (at least for the short run). That is not to discount the importance of long-run improvements in productivity to raise living standards, but we also need to be patient for the latest innovations to work their way into improving labor quality. Also, productivity growth is still positive, so there isn’t much to be overly pessimistic about at the moment.

Disclosure

Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss.

Zacks Investment Management, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Zacks Investment Research. Zacks Investment Management is an independent Registered Investment Advisory firm and acts an investment manager for individuals and institutions. Zacks Investment Research is a provider of earnings data and other financial data to institutions and to individuals.

This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. Do not act or rely upon the information and advice given in this publication without seeking the services of competent and professional legal, tax, or accounting counsel. The information contained herein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but we do not guarantee accuracy or completeness. Publication and distribution of this article is not intended to create, and the information contained herein does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment or strategy is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of herein and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole.
READ PREVIOUS
S&P Finishes Positive in Q1 2016
READ NEXT
5 Tech Products and the Changing Investing Landscape

Explore Zack’s Archives

View
Mitch's Mailbox
September 10th, 2025
Weak Jobs Reports, Inflation Worries, And The Fed’s Next Move
Read more
Private Client Group
September 8th, 2025
Global Yields, Earnings Strength, And Tariff Risks
Read more
Mitch on the Markets
September 8th, 2025
What Q2 Results Signal For Investors
Read more
Mitch's Mailbox
September 4th, 2025
What Can Investors Take Away From Revised Q2 GDP Numbers?
Read more
Private Client Group
September 2nd, 2025
Business Investment Rebounds, U.S.-China Trade Talks, AI Disruption Fears
Read more
Mitch on the Markets
September 2nd, 2025
The September Rate Cut Won’t Have A Big Impact 
Read more

Daily financial tips directly
from the Zacks family.

Top

Search

Contact

I'm a Private Client I'm a Financial Professional