Shawn and Haley B. from Roanoke, VA ask: Hi Mitch, with tariffs returning to center stage in terms of economic policy, we’re wondering if inflation will become a concern again. Do you think that could make Treasury bonds more attractive as the year progresses? Thank you.
Mitch’s Response:
Thanks for writing. Your question offers valuable insight by drawing links between higher tariffs, higher prices, and the bond market’s response to higher prices or the expectation of higher prices.
It’s this last point—regarding inflation expectations—that I think investors should be focused on.
Looking back on President Trump’s first term, we’re able to make a few assessments about tariffs that can inform how investors position this time around. Some readers may remember the 2018 steel tariffs on Mexico and Canada, which rattled markets and were met with retaliatory tariffs. Within a year, though, the tariffs were dropped, and NAFTA was replaced by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement—which expanded NAFTA’s scope and opened doors for more trade, not less.
There was a lot of other trade and tariff posturing, but the duties that ultimately stuck were tariffs on Chinese imports. The market, economic, and inflationary impact of these tariffs has arguably been quite muted, in my view, as measured by total trade and equity market performance over that period. A lot of trade was ultimately rerouted through countries like Vietnam and Mexico.
Market fluctuations often raise tough questions for investors, especially when policy changes—like tariffs—impact expectations. Understanding these dynamics can help you make informed decisions during uncertain times.
Anyone following the news over the weekend likely felt some alarm at the new 25% tariffs on Mexico and Canada, along with an additional 10% tariffs on Chinese imports. But within hours of the market’s opening on Monday, the tariffs on Mexico were delayed by one month. This is not to say that there is a low likelihood of tariffs sticking and an all-out trade war breaking out. But there does seem to be a pattern here, and it’s one where the worst feared outcomes do not come to fruition (read: positive surprise for markets).
That all being said, there is one key difference between tariffs in President Trump’s first term versus tariffs today. And that difference is inflation.
In President Trump’s first term, inflation expectations were firmly anchored in the 2% range (see chart below). Consumers had not experienced significant inflation in decades, and businesses were reluctant to pass along any higher costs.
Inflation Expectations Have Come Down from 2022 but Remain Above 2%
Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis2
Today, inflation expectations have not quite come back down to the 2% level, and consumers and businesses are more sensitive to price increases and the potential for higher input costs. To the extent that tariffs and escalating trade tensions result in rising inflation expectations, it can have a realized effect on actual inflation as consumers pull forward purchases and businesses raise prices preemptively. If Treasury yields move higher for this reason and not because of expectations for higher growth, we could see some consternation in equity markets.
The more benign outcome, and one that we’d hope for, is that accelerating economic growth pushes bond yields higher alongside appreciating equity markets, in which case investors across the growth and income spectrum benefit. In my view, if we see more targeted and limited tariffs (better-than-expected outcomes) along with deregulation efforts and stimulative fiscal policy, this can serve as a catalyst for the current business cycle.
As tariffs, inflation expectations, and shifting bond yields influence today’s markets, it’s important to have a strategy in place. To help you manage current market changes, I recommend downloading our free guide, “Navigating Market Volatility3.” It answers key questions such as:
Market downturns can and will occur, but what should you do?
How can diversification help you manage volatility without compromising your returns?
When volatility is too much for you to handle, how can a money manager help?
Can volatility actually be an opportunity?
If you have $500,000 or more to invest and want to get answers to the questions above, click on the link below to download this guide today!
1 ZIM may amend or rescind the guide “Helping You Manage Market Volatility” for any reason and at ZIM’s discretion.
2 Fred Economic Data. January 15, 2025. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/seriesBeta/EXPINF1YR#
3 ZIM may amend or rescind the guide “Helping You Manage Market Volatility” for any reason and at ZIM’s discretion.
DISCLOSURE
Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Inherent in any investment is the potential for loss.
Zacks Investment Management, Inc. is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Zacks Investment Research. Zacks Investment Management is an independent Registered Investment Advisory firm and acts as an investment manager for individuals and institutions. Zacks Investment Research is a provider of earnings data and other financial data to institutions and to individuals.
This material is being provided for informational purposes only and nothing herein constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a recommendation to buy, sell or hold a security. Do not act or rely upon the information and advice given in this publication without seeking the services of competent and professional legal, tax, or accounting counsel. Publication and distribution of this article is not intended to create, and the information contained herein does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. No recommendation or advice is being given as to whether any investment or strategy is suitable for a particular investor. It should not be assumed that any investments in securities, companies, sectors or markets identified and described were or will be profitable. All information is current as of the date of herein and is subject to change without notice. Any views or opinions expressed may not reflect those of the firm as a whole.
Any projections, targets, or estimates in this report are forward looking statements and are based on the firm’s research, analysis, and assumptions. Due to rapidly changing market conditions and the complexity of investment decisions, supplemental information and other sources may be required to make informed investment decisions based on your individual investment objectives and suitability specifications. All expressions of opinions are subject to change without notice. Clients should seek financial advice regarding the appropriateness of investing in any security or investment strategy discussed in this presentation.
Certain economic and market information contained herein has been obtained from published sources prepared by other parties. Zacks Investment Management does not assume any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of such information. Further, no third party has assumed responsibility for independently verifying the information contained herein and accordingly no such persons make any representations with respect to the accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of the information provided herein. Unless otherwise indicated, market analysis and conclusions are based upon opinions or assumptions that Zacks Investment Management considers to be reasonable. Any investment inherently involves a high degree of risk, beyond any specific risks discussed herein.
The S&P 500 Index is a well-known, unmanaged index of the prices of 500 large-company common stocks, mainly blue-chip stocks, selected by Standard & Poor’s. The S&P 500 Index assumes reinvestment of dividends but does not reflect advisory fees. The volatility of the benchmark may be materially different from the individual performance obtained by a specific investor. An investor cannot invest directly in an index.
The Russell 2000 Index is a well-known, unmanaged index of the prices of 2000 small-cap company common stocks, selected by Russell. The Russell 2000 Index assumes reinvestment of dividends but does not reflect advisory fees. An investor cannot invest directly in an index. The volatility of the benchmark may be materially different from the individual performance obtained by a specific investor.